By Joao F.
March 31 marked the 57th anniversary of the 1964 Brazilian coup d’etat.
Similar to that decade, Brazil is experiencing turmoil in the sphere of its military this year. On March 29, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro fired the defense minister and replaced him with a yes-man, causing a sharp strain in relations between the military and the central government. However, out of respect for Bolsonaro, the military brass has resigned instead of launching a coup. This has given the president complete power to forge the military brass however he wishes to, and he has already appointed yes-men to every vacant position.
I would like to speak about history, try to show some dynamics of the Brazilian formation as well, to show some relations of the current crisis of the political system, with Bolsonaro and the military, from a perspective of longue durée.
Before I start, I would like to point out that everything here is just comments, general panoramas,
there is a very rich academic production about all the themes dealt with here, and there is still a lot
to discover. I hope you all like it.
Brazil is a continental country, located in South America, with a population of about 211 million
people. It has a huge diversity and a rich history. Was the last American country to formally abolish black slavery (1888), and until today the racial, indigenous, class and gender issues are fundamental to understand our dynamics.
Brazil is the has the largest black population outside Africa in the world, having about 305 different indigenous ethnicities ( which is much more than Bolivia and Peru), some of them are still isolated.
Currently, there are about 256 groups in Brazilian territory, speaking more than 150 different
languages, the first inhabitants arrived from several migratory waves, coming from different points, and until today there are different interpretations of this process. But, scholars believe that at least 10,500 years ago practically the entire territory that would become Brazil was already inhabited.
Demographically, the majority of the Brazilian population is "mestiza/parda” ( which is the
miscegenation between indigenous, black, and white) and black.
The white population is almost half of the total population (47,5%), the largest in Latin America, the total Brazilian white population is greater than the white population of Mexico and Argentina
combined. Pardos, Mestizos and the Black population correspond to another half (50-51%),
indigenous people (0,42%) and asians (1,1%).
Before the colonization, between 4 and 10 million people were already living in Brazil's territory.
Today, the indigenous population corresponds to 816,917 people. The colonial period was strongly
marked by epidemics, black/indigenous slavery, and systemic sexual violence.
It is estimated that more than 5 million Africans were forcibly brought to Portuguese America in the context of the lucrative trans-Atlantic slave trade. This flow was uninterrupted and massive.
Therefore, the ethnic and the linguistic diversity within the native peoples, some foreign religious
groups were forcibly brought into Brazil, certain tensions and some African religious disputes
continued on the American continent. There are some ethnic groups that led heroic resistance against slavery whom continue to play a role in African politics today, such as in Nigeria.
Most of the enslaved came not only from Angola, Congo, and Mozambique, but also from Nigeria
and the Gulf of Guinea region, who also left a strong presence in Brazilian culture.
This human trafficking took place within an intricate geopolitical structure, centered on the South
Atlantic, and had Europe and Asia as its fundamental poles.
Dominant groups in African politics political entities, in their internal dynamics, allied themselves
with European monarchies, establishing a deep political and economic relationship, generating
change of hierarchies, ascension of new political groups, and even the birth of new dynasties, in this context, the human trafficking in the Atlantic Ocean, provided the human flow needed to maintain this economic and international structure.
Recently, Brazil received an important migratory flow, mainly from Haiti, Bolivia, Venezuela,
Argentina and some African countries. Historically, Brazil has a very significant immigrant population of Lebanese, Syrians, Italians, Germans, Koreans, Chinese and Japanese, and even today its presence s very expressive. Brazil has the largest Japanese and Okinawan community in the whole world.
Although each Latin American country has a particular idea of race, and these experiences, identities and evolution, these concepts are not similar, making sense only within their national contexts. Due to the large mixed population it is easy to get confused if based only on the phenotype. Even so the idea of a white race was fundamental in Brazilian formation. Not only during the colonization, but also throughout the Republic. The eugenic policies of the 19th and in the beginning of 20th century are an example of it, and it is necessary to understand how this belief always remains.
Brazil is one of the most Christian countries in the world, is probably thethe largest Catholic nation, with almost 80% of the population either Catholic or Protestant. However, there are several Afro-Brazilian religions being practiced throughout the territory, besides several native creeds.
Brazilian history, since the beginning of colonization (in 1500), is the history of an uprising and
resistance of the indigenous, the enslaved black.
The Portuguese arrived in the coast in 1500, but the formal colonial period lasted from 1530 to
1815, leaving behind a bloody legacy. It's impossible to measure the colonization impact.
During the colonial period, France and Netherlands have conducted some colonial experiences
where now the Brazilian territory, besides that, there was also a period of an dynastic union
between the crowns of Spain and Portugal (1580-1640).
Many European wars saw Brazil as the their battlefield, in the colonial period, the Portuguese carried out a historical dispute in the estuary of the Plate River with Spain.
Moreover, huge uprisings happened too, they never stopped, from great indigenous confederations to the largest Quilombo/Palenque in South America, Palmares (1605-1694), some of these experiences lasted decades and generated real dual power situations.
The Portuguese colonization of South America is within the context of economic and cultural
expansion of the European powers, and the emergence of processes that will result in the formation of modern State, and the primitive accumulation of wealth, that will later enable the capitalism. At the end of colonization, some provinces were in fact isolated from each other, and in other cases, they had more ties to Africa or with the colonial Metropolis, than each other.
In 1815, Brazilian state was elevated to the rank of a kingdom in union with the Portuguese Crown.
In a nutshell, the independence process began with tensions unleashed when the Portuguese court
fled to Rio (the only American city to act as a capital for a European empire) due to the Napoleonic
Wars, arriving at the ports of Salvador in 1808, thereafter establishing Rio de Janeiro as capital of the Portuguese Empire. With this move, King João VI managed to keep his empire and continue the war against France on American territory. In doing so, the colonial pact had been broken, and the ports were opened to foreigners.
With the end of the war, João VI returned to the troubled Portugal, which was going through serious instabilities due to the Liberal Revolution of 1820. His son, subsequently crowned as Pedro I, stayed in Brazil. Then, pressured by the elites who feared (with many reasons) the return to colonial status, he declared independence, and won a war against his father.
These military confrontations happened where today's Uruguay, and the Brazilian states of Bahia,
Maranhão, states that at the time formed the province of Grão-Pará. Thhis way, Brazil achieve its
Thereafter, the Brazilian Empire (1822-1889) was formed, as a parliamentary constitutional
monarchy, with a European monarch. Still it was very aristocratic, but with some industrializing
tendencies, all based around the slavery model.
In the XIX century, Brazil got involved in geopolitical disputes and wars with the newly neighboring Republics, mainly where Argentina and Uruguay are located now, some of these wars had a clear imperialist and counter-revolutionary character (1816-1820, 1825-1828, 1839-1851, 1851-1852, 1864-1865).
This dispute and conflicts on the La Plata river would subsequently escalate to the great war of 1864- 1870 (Paraguayan War, or La Guerra Guasú/GUerra dde La Triple Alianza), the largest in the South America continent: fundamental to understanding the consolidation of the Brazilian Army (soon we will talk a lot about them).
From then on, not only in brazil, but throughout the region, the militaries would consolidate their
presence in the exercise of power and their National Armed Forces.
Furthermore, during the monarchy, Brazil experienced great instability. Some of the biggest popular uprisings in Brazilian history took place during this time, such as the Cabanos uprising (1835-1840) in the current states of Pará, Amazonas, Amapá, Roraima and Rondônia , Malês Revolt, (1835) and Sabinada, in Bahia Province (1837 – 1838), Balaiada, in Maranhão Province (1838 – 1841), and also attempts at liberal revolutions(1824, 1842), all with a strong indigenous and black presence.
At that time, a process of important and complex civil wars (marked by strong regional dynamics.)
and disputes between provincial oligarchies began, which lasted practically until the end of the First Republic(1889-1930), these wars are fundamental for understanding the emergence of a sui generis capitalist development.
The Empire followed a dynamic between two parties, Liberal and Conservative, with the Crown
mediation, besides regional disputes and a growing political action by the masses, liberal
republicanism and social movements (Abolitionism, Socialism, and Federalism).
Due to the strong pressure from the abolitionist and republican movement, and international
pressure as well, mainly by the UK, the slavery, which was the main institution of the empire,
(regulated by law), began to be threatened.
However, after a long process of struggles and advances, conquered by the popular struggle, the
slavery in Brazil was formally abolished in 1888 through Princess Isabel signature in the "Lei Áurea".
The freedmen were not rewarded with land, or integrated into society. New exclusion mechanisms
were created, the big farmers and slave owners, who always resisted abolition, were even
indemnified. With the formal end of the main economic structure, the monarchy collapsed, and, in
1889, it was overthrown by a military coup that proclaimed the Republic.
The Republic ended the Catholic monarchy, separating the State from the Church, but manages to
be even more unstable and violent than the monarchy, although, the new Republic will always try to wear a liberal veil to legitimize his crimes.
The First Republic (1889-1930) was marked by decentralization, increase in foreign immigration,
beginning of urbanization, and the development of new political parties, social movements, and also the maintenance of the marginalization and exclusion of certain social groups, several civil wars and revolts, even within the army (1891-1894, 1893-1895, 1896-1897, 1914, 1912-1916, 1923, 1924, 1925-1927, 1930).
The repressive and colonial character of the Brazilian State becomes even more outstanding. The
Republic concretizes the economic decline of certain regions, creating a strong political structure
that prioritizes the economic interests of the Southeast provinces allied with the regionals
The main dynamics of contemporary Brazilian political history is the contradictions of maintaining the colonial and dependency structures, the inability to resolve the regional and class issues, and the conflicts caused by capitalist modernization.
As a great Latin American scholar, Augustin Cuevas, says, Latin American democracies are
structurally restricted, unable to definitively integrate the people. and consequently, unable to
breaks up with the dynamics of the center's periphery, unable to develop a national project, Latin
American democracies coexist peacefully with racism and exclusion mechanisms.
In the Brazilian case, the old structures of colonial economy still exist,in other forms. Therefore, in
the Brazilian society, any person who is not "white" is considered black. Racism permeates all social relations in the country, even though racism in has a strong gender character, strongly related to class dynamics and socialization.
In this way, the Western liberal thesis works very bad in addressing colorism, even its spread in
universities and liberal circles. It is impossible for them to describe the favelas, for example.
In fact, many other dynamics also remain. In the same way that it is possible to say that Brazilian
history is the history of revolts, it can also be said that it is the history of the great restorations, of
the "great illustrated men", the white farmers and the military, the great massacres as well,
something remarkable in the official narratives.
A great Brazilian anthropologist, Darcy Ribeiro, said: "Brazil is the USA in which the South won the war". So, for structural economic reasons Brazilian oligarchies are historically racists and eugenics, and they had to maintain a brutal colonial State, always associated with the international market, to survive.
The First Republic was marked by an extremely restricted and fraudulent democracy. Great
oligarchic disputes were often resolved militarily, and a singular presence of military in politics
(mainly in the early years) it was significant, occupying the presidency, being elected, and having a
very significant role in the daily life, where the political power, and the land, is owned and exercised by military, families, oligarchies, security agents or charismatic military figures, generating complex structures of power, in a very decentralized, regionalized way.
Moreover, the First Republic also experienced the beginning of urbanization and the consolidation of social movements, several strikes, anarchists and communists revolts happened, including nationals armed uprisings (1917-1918, 1923-1924) that will continue until the Vargas Era.
In 1930, due to electoral fraud and regional disputes, a coalition of provinces dissatisfied or excluded from the current oligarchic pact, led a military coup, known as the 1930 Revolution.
The Vargas Era began, accelerating changes and contradictions that the Republic generated.
Restoration or modernization? Controlled opening or dictatorship? Fascism or Revolution?
Here the role of the military is evident: the officers who fought in civil wars, participated or
repressed revolts, were the same ones who participated and later joined the revolution in 1930.
The revolution was a clearly anti-liberal block, with a modernizing identity, but still very oligarchic
and conservative, to be more exact, a conservative reformism or an oligarchic reformism.
However, it created the basis for national development, and the idea of nation. The focus of the
revolution was to break the structure created by the São Paulo oligarchy.
This dispute took place in the first years of the provisional government, culminating in the war of
1932, where the São Paulo oligarchy turned against the federal government, demanding a
constituent, but also wishing to recover their power.
São Paulo is militarily defeated, but wins in a political dimension. From this process a new pact was formed between the oligarchies, which were increasingly moving towards a regime closure, which is evident in the constitution of 1934, and later in the Estado Novo dictatorship (1937-1946). This period is marked by a state of emergency, the congress was closed several times, a lot of repression of the popular classes, a great anti-communism, and economic development.
"Let us make the revolution before people do it." It is believed that this was the declaration of
Governor of Minas Gerais (one of the most important oligarchies of the First Republic, which break up an oligarchic pact with São Paulo in 30s), Antônio Carlos de Andrada, reveals the character of the 1930 Revolution.
Police quarter in Natal (Rio Grande do Norte), riddled with bullets during the 1935 Communist
Uprising. (Credit: Public Domain) Vargas admnistration is the result of the positivist oligarchy of Rio Grande do Sul State, which was consolidated in the great civil wars of the end of the monarchy
He assumed power shortly after the revolution, and reached visibility during the wars and crises at
the end of the first republic, and it started a modernizing process, which seek to align and co-opt the social movements, workers organizations, and oligarchies to create an autonomous model.
In this period a series of reforms were carried out, creation of a set of labor laws (CLT, currently was destroyed by the 2016 coup), the development of public education, the female suffrage. Besides the creation of state-owned companies, and nationalizing of others, an integration program began with neighboring countries (Argentina and Chile), neither aligned with the Axis or with Washington, much less with Moscow.
The Estado Novo fought the left-wing revolutionary groups and fascist groups too (AIB, Ação
Integralista Brasileira). Brazil also fought in the both world wars, always against Germany, even as
Nazi ideology had lots of prestige in the armed forces and political oligarchies.
However, it was in this period that the military's political performance was consolidated, as in the
creation of a national security doctrine. The same officers who helped Vargas to seize power are the same ones who topple him in 1945, and were the same as who led the destruction of his legacy, and consolidated the alignment with US (a process that has existed since the XIX century.).
After the fall of Vargas, the repressive apparatus of the Estado Novo seized power, and began an
opening, maintaining much of the old restrictions.
It is worth remembering that much of the republican period, leftist parties were illegal. Between
1945-64, Brazil faced a period of unprecedented democracy until then (surpassed only by the Sixth
This democratic period and the subsequent dictatorship coincided with a major urbanization,
internal migration, creation of a new capital (Brasilia, 1960). Vargas would still return, by vote, and he would continue his developmental project, but due to great instability and coup attempts, he committed suicide.
The final years of the Fourth Republic (1946-1964) are going to be marked by coup attempts(1956,
1959), left-wing mobilizations (1961-1962) a lot of popular and middle class mobilization, and a soft coup, that implemented the parliamentary system. But mainly, a great economic crisis, causing the rise of the masses and also fascism.
It is important to talk a little more about the last dictatorship, that of Operation Condor.The 1964
coup was an attempt to start a secessionist civil war (initially Minas Gerais), with US military aerial and naval support in the Espírito Santo coast toward Brasilia and Rio, led by the fascist (literally Integralist) and pro-American wing of the armed forces.
The 1950-1960s were troubled times, that coincided with a great cultural revolution, fruit of the
great Brazilian artistic and scientific development. At that time there was great support for a
nationalist project or even a workers' revolution.
There were united workers' organizations along with revolutionary organizations not related to the
Goulart administration, ready even for armed struggle, besides a large nationalist and left wing
within the armed forces, simultaneously of a great intellectual production and a cultural revolution
that spoke openly of reforming the structures of the country. The Ligas Camponesas, a peasant
organization, which was fighting for land redistribution, came to possess almost 100 thousand
members in the 60s.
In the 60s, Brazil lived once again in a pre-revolutionary situation. There was a large union of
students, black and feminist movement organizations, politically, this process was materialized in
Joao Goulart, and was heir to the Varguist tradition of the oligarchy of Rio Grande do Sul. Goulart
had come to power, by accident, in the 60s.
He was a labor politician, whose projects were a series of modernizing reforms, such as agrarian
reform. He was still wealthy farmer, but he wanted to include the masses on the politics. As
president, Goulart had power over the armed forces, and troops under his command, ready to fight
the putch. Goulart and the left decided not to go into combat, more States joined the insurgent
troops, and the coup was successful.
The military and national corporates gradually created a new political system, and started a white
terror campaign (tortures, executions and sexual violence), targets civilians, leftist and nationalists. The official numbers talk about A 500 dead, but the worst case scenarios estimate something between 10-50k or more,the mainly targets indigenous and poor people (this inaccuracy is due to the lack of access to official documentation, the decentralization of repression and the regime's lack of control over political violence and right-wing death squads.)
Along with a great purge on the more nationalist and leftist sector of the armed forces, there was
also a reorganization of the media system and universities, with a policy of direct intervention in
these spaces, censorship, massive exile of intellectuals, a huge brain drain, and opening of Brazilian media and universities to American companies and international capital. All with the encouragement and active participation of the Brazilian bourgeoise.
The congress was closed several times, and they governed unconstitutionally. Even though political parties were made illegal. The congress created two parties which functioned as a conceded opposition and also to pretend some democratic facade. The dictatorship (1964-1985) governed unconstitutionally, through Atos Institucionais, which gradually reduced political rights, changed the rules of the political system, and increased repression. In 1968, the regime's hard line assumes power and promulgates AI 5, from then on the regime closes completely.
Throughout the dictatorship, the military will have to deal with a very combative and revolutionary
working class. During this period, strikes and historic struggles took place (60s-80s), intensifying
repression, but also forcing greater political openness (creation of new partiies and others reforms). These workers' struggles will continue even with the end of the military regime.
In geopolitical terms, the military was involved in geopolitical disputes and an arms race with
Argentina, Brazil have played a fundamental regional role, maintaining the Bolivian and Paraguayan dictatorships.
And also had helped to combat communist insurgency illegally in Africa, the military gave logistical support for the counter ML insurgency in Uruguay (existed plans to invade the UY if the Frente Amplio won the elections or the anarchists and Tupamaros won the war.) Leading Central American troops and actively participating in the Dominican Civil War (1965) and later occupation.
It was one of the first coups sponsored by the CIA, already established by the model of Iran,
Guatemala etc, and linked to the Suharto rise in Indonesia. Moreover, it was one of the few Latin
American dictatorships that rehearsed industrialization, but it was allied with foreign capital.
One of the first measures was to reverse Vargas' policies, internationalize the economy and profits,
demobilizing the workers and revolutionary movements (by force and extermination).
There were several guerrilla attempts (COLINA, ALN, MR-8, VPR, VAR-Palmares) in the countryside and urban areas. The most famous occurred in the North of the country where the state boundaries between Pará, Tocantins and Maranhão, known as Araguaia Guerilla (1967-1974).
None were successful, there was no foreign support (unlike years 20-30 where the Brazilian left had greater support from the USSR). Among the groups that launched the armed struggle, there are several tendencies, some believed it was necessary to create bases for a prolonged war, others
believed that the dictatorship would fall soon.
The dictatorship was a series of civilian and military governments, with five presidents, all generals, and two military juntas. It was marked by pharaonic projects, chauvinistic sentiment, wage crunch, great population growth, internal migrations, and the , and the emergence of networks involved in narco.
Along with this, there was a false economic miracle that served to legitimize the dictatorship for the middle classes. This development has always been associated with foreign capital. However, there was no distribution. Many of the conquests and rights in force today, such as public education, a public health system, LGBT and women’s rights, were only achieved in the constitution of ‘88 at the end of the dictatorship.
Even though Latin America has experienced a pre-revolutionary situation in the 1990s ( as like
Ecuador, Venezuela, Mexico, Venezuela, Chile and Argentina), but there was no party willing to lead the process.
The dictatorship ended as in Spain or Chile: on top, slowly, despite the pressure from the streets.
The military was given amnesty (until almost 2016, when a shy National Truth Commission was
The Armed Forces remained with many privileges, and the parties of the dictatorship wrote a new
constitution, which was not voted, and the Sixth Republic (1988) begins. Brazil was one of the only
dictatorships that ended up coming because they decided to come out of power, a slow, gradual and safe opening way According to General Geisel, it was not because of their crimes, but due
international isolation and economic failure.
Tuíre, a Mēbêngôkre woman, points a knife at the director of an electrical company Altamira, Pará, February 1989. They continue with a lot of power, with autonomous institutions and courts, and a strong family bureaucracy too. Never had a reform in the Police or in the Armed Forces, which has coordinated the State terrorism.
Untill today, death squads remain a real fucking issue, and despite the massive scientific production and attempts to build a memory, there is still a great revisionist and pro dictatorship rhetoric within Institutions and onther spheres. After the "economic miracle", the society collapsed. The dictatorship left behind a wealthy state with a huge inequality.
At the beginning of redemocratization, the sixth republic was marked by inflation, and it only
changed with the creation of a new currency. Moreover, it was created a pact among the elites,
creating a bi-party alternation (PT x PSDB) system, based on the financialization, export of
commodities, and an unprecedented expansion of state indebtedness ( in an already
internationalized economy) greater dependence on mining and agribussines, a historic expansion of the latifundio and and the concentration of wealth as well.
The 1990s were marked for big strikes, popular mobilizations, electoral fraud and the beginning of a neoliberal project, which is being implemented very slowly.
So, there was a social democratic government between the years 2003-2016, these governments
were generated from the struggles and strikes of the 90s.
PT (Worker's Party), initially led by a former union leader coming from Pernambuco state, in the
northeast, Lula (2003-2007/2008-2011), followed by a former guerrilla fighter (She was a victim of state terrorism), Dilma Roussef (2010-2014/2014-2016), the first woman to be elected president in Brazilian history.
But, these governments were far from revolutionary, not because there is an agenda to be followed,
or an superior economic system, but because of growing distance from the bases, the break with
indigenous organizations (as in Ecuador and Bolivia), the lack of a mass line, and the tendency to
negotiate with the bourgeoisie has affected the PT's political survival.
However, when elected, they negotiated and the neo-liberal policies continued. There was an
increase in salaries, income distribution, and compensation policies, as well as an increase in
consumption, and the discovery of, one of the largest oil reserves in the world, the Pré Salt. The
universities policies broke very subtly and slowly with the social segregation from the dictatorship.
There was a significant development of state-owned enterprises, industries, in the chemistry, oil and infrastructure sector. Brazilian companies started to compete for markets in Africa, Caribbean Sea, South and Central America.
Brazil not only joined the BRICS, but was present in the organization since its formation. The banks and farmers never have so much profit in history (before the 2016 coup, obviously).
Creating a kind of pact among the national bourgeoisie (the banks, farmers, mining companies, the international capital, and the union bureaucracy), the PT governments, has succeeded, subtly,
included the poor in the budget.
Much of this economic growth was due to the Chinese economy, the main Brazilian economic
partner, together with the commodity boom. Financial capital and its imperialist States have always envied Brazilian resources, and their gigantic reserves of oil and water. They also did not like the development of Brazilian companies (curiously created by Vargas).
The bourgeoisie felt that their structures were changing, their intractable racism couldn't stand the
social ascension of the poor and the rise of a new emerging class, even though public and
distributive policies were very cheap and represent almost nothing in the Brazilian budget, and do
not even compare with the size of the profits and international reserves.
However, with the arrival of the winds of the 2008 crisis (culminating in 2014), the Brazilian
government became increasingly neoliberal, and all compensatory policies began to have greater
resistance to be implemented.
The lack of a mass line became clear with the rise of social movements, which did not have PT
support, and a long cycle of strikes, as in Chile, Argentina and Mexico. A series of repressive laws
regarding the war on drugs were implemented during PT governments (like other latin american
countries). With the rise of the masses, even an anti-terrorist law was written.
The increase in the incarceration of poor youth in the context of the drug war was significant, along with militarization, when the army began to fight narco directly in exceptional cases, where they carry out military operations in urban areas and the countryside, with the aim of "guaranteeing law and order" or "pacifying" very specific regions, usually favelas (as in Mexico and Colombia).
So, in 2013, after huge national riots caused by the increase in the passage of public transport
together with the biggest university strikes in Brazilian history, followed by mobilization of various
sectors of the working class in the following years (something similar will happen in Mexico from
2016), the former president wrote anti-terrorist laws, besides forming a pact with the states that
would guarantee the continuation of austerity measures (later used against her).
The last Dilma government alone was proof of the reactionary nature of the Brazilian bourgeoisie.
After being elected, she applies the project of her adversary, very neoliberal (a state governor,
involved with narco), but it didn't help.
Then in 2016, the Congress and the Supreme Court disbanded her with a criminal maneuver, with
the support of the CIA (Lava a Jato). Then, we had 2 years of interim and ultra neo-liberal
government led by Dilma's vice president, Michel Temer.
Already in 2016, it is possible to see an absurd cohesion among the national bourgeoisies in a coup
project, which would include even the democratic and liberal left parties.
After Bolsonaro's election, this bourgeois cohesion would become even more explicit, as he would
have support from the most backward sectors of the economy, and also from national banks, foreign capital, and a strange connivance from the opposition and union bureaucracies. Creating a new dynamics, where the powers are held by the Courts (Supremo Tribunal Federal) and the military (represented by the Executive Power).
Temer administration intensified the war against rival cartels and intervened militarily in some states (the socialist activist Mariele Franco, was murdered during one of these operations, while
investigating police violence), the masses continued on the streets, but without support from the PT.
The right wing groups, wich has always been mobilized, controlled the movement, while the left side were repressed. In the 2018 elections process, the Courts held ex-president Lula, who would
certainly win the elections, as Bolsonaro and a general of special forces (Mourão) are elected, with
various evidences of electoral fraud.
The base of the current government is the latifundiarios, the mining, the state's military police, some churches, the paramilitaries (these groups already existed before the dictatorship, but developed after the 1964 military coup ) and the financial sector. However, today, is already public knowledge that it was the Armed Forces that maintained the interim government, and that today it maintained Bolsonaro, indeed.
An organ of security and intelligence was recreated by Dilma in 2016. The Gabinete de Segurança
Institucional da Presidência da República (GSI/PR). It was along the lines of the last dictatorship SNI (Serviço Nacional de Informações), and was led by General Heleno (one of the regime's strong men), who initially led the UN occupation in Haiti, MINUSTAH (2004-2017). Mourão and Heleno served as c